Investors, acquirers, boards, and deal teams.
Use TIGRE when the opportunity sounds promising but the decision depends on whether the device, process, product, manufacturing path, customer wedge, and capital plan fit together.
TIGRE pressure-tests semiconductor and hard-tech opportunities when the key risk is buried inside the technical-commercial core.
What is real? What is missing? What breaks?
Scope DiligenceUse TIGRE when the opportunity sounds promising but the decision depends on whether the device, process, product, manufacturing path, customer wedge, and capital plan fit together.
A technical-commercial risk map, what-must-be-true assumptions, evidence gaps, kill questions, manufacturing and qualification review, and a blunt proceed / pause / re-scope / kill recommendation.
Does the evidence support the claim, or has the story outrun the data?
What has to be true about process control, yield, test, foundry access, packaging, and qualification?
What painful bottleneck does the product remove, for whom, and why now?
Are the next proof points decision-grade, or just confidence theater?
Is there investable moat, or merely novelty that can be copied, designed around, or ignored?
Where does the plan most likely break: physics, process, product, customer, channel, cash, or governance?
Red/yellow/green view of technical, manufacturing, customer, qualification, and capital risks.
What evidence is missing, which evidence is weak, and which claims need independent confirmation.
Specific questions that should determine whether the opportunity proceeds, pauses, or gets re-scoped.
Process, yield, test, foundry, packaging, reliability, and qualification issues that may change the business case.
Whether the product removes a painful bottleneck for a specific buyer with a reason to act now.
Plain-language conclusion for an investment committee, board, acquirer, executive sponsor, or founder.
Broad advisory teams can own market process, transaction context, program management, and executive packaging. TIGRE can plug in as the technical-commercial judgment layer when the decisive uncertainty sits close to the technology.
Does the process scale? Is foundry compatibility real? Does the customer need justify switching? Are qualification and test plans credible? Does the milestone kill risk or create theater? Is defensibility investable?