Investors, acquirers, boards, and deal teams.
Use TIGRE when a semiconductor or hard-tech opportunity sounds credible, but the decision depends on whether the claim, build path, market wedge, milestone logic, and capital plan fit together.
Diligence is not about finding reasons to say no. It is about knowing whether the story can support the decision.
Defensible confidence before capital, valuation, deal momentum, or credibility is committed.
Scope DiligenceUse TIGRE when a semiconductor or hard-tech opportunity sounds credible, but the decision depends on whether the claim, build path, market wedge, milestone logic, and capital plan fit together.
A technical-commercial risk map, what-must-be-true assumptions, evidence gaps, decision-critical questions, manufacturing and qualification review, and a clear proceed / pause / re-scope / stop recommendation.
Does the evidence support the claim, or is the narrative ahead of the data?
What has to be true about process control, yield, test, foundry access, packaging, and qualification?
Who needs this enough to act now, and what drives adoption?
Will the next proof point reduce the uncertainty that matters to the next decision?
Is there moat beyond novelty: know-how, access, IP, process control, customer pull, or switching cost?
Physics, process, customer, channel, cash, governance, or timing.
The evidence supports the investment, acquisition, partnership, or next phase.
The story needs more evidence before momentum increases.
The wedge, milestone, build path, or diligence scope needs adjustment.
The decision-critical assumption does not support the commitment.
The technical-commercial risk is understood well enough to move forward.
Scarce attention should move toward the most defensible path.
Broad advisory teams can own market process, transaction context, program management, and executive packaging. TIGRE can plug in as the technical-commercial judgment layer when the decisive uncertainty sits close to the technology.
Is the foundry claim real? Does the test chip reduce decision-critical risk? Can the process scale? Does the customer wedge justify adoption? Does the milestone support the next commitment?